Welcome to the Off-Shore Club

The #1 Social Engineering Project in the world since 2004 !

Important Notice:

✅UPGRADE YOUR ACCOUNT TODAY TO ACCESS ALL OFF-SHORE FORUMS✅

[New]Telegram Channel

In case our domain name changes, we advise you to subscribe to our new TG channel to always be aware of all events and updates -
https://t.me/rtmsechannel

OFF-SHORE Staff Announcement: 30% Bonus on ALL Wallet Deposit this week


For example, if you deposit $1000, your RTM Advertising Balance will be $1300 that can be used to purchase eligible products and service on forums or request withdrawal. The limit deposit to get the 30% bonus is $10,000 for a $3000 Marketplace wallet balance Bonus.

Deposit Now and claim 30% more balance ! - BTC/LTC/XMR


Always use a Mixer to keep Maximum anonimity ! - BTC to BTC or BTC to XMR

💣Exploit CVE-2021-47562 - In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability h

⚠️Always Remember to keep your identity safe by using a Zero-KYC Zero-AML like https://coinshift.money⚠️

Gold

Maksim

Tactician
Staff member
Administrator
Instructor
USDT(TRC-20)
$450.0
CVE ID : CVE-2021-47562
Published : May 24, 2024, 3:15 p.m. | 26 minutes ago
Description : In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ice: fix vsi->txq_map sizing The approach of having XDP queue per CPU regardless of user's setting exposed a hidden bug that could occur in case when Rx queue count differ from Tx queue count. Currently vsi->txq_map's size is equal to the doubled vsi->alloc_txq, which is not correct due to the fact that XDP rings were previously based on the Rx queue count. Below splat can be seen when ethtool -L is used and XDP rings are configured: [ 682.875339] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000000f [ 682.883403] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [ 682.889345] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page [ 682.895289] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 682.898218] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI [ 682.903055] CPU: 42 PID: 2878 Comm: ethtool Tainted: G OE 5.15.0-rc5+ #1 [ 682.912214] Hardware name: Intel Corp. GRANTLEY/GRANTLEY, BIOS GRRFCRB1.86B.0276.D07.1605190235 05/19/2016 [ 682.923380] RIP: 0010:devres_remove+0x44/0x130 [ 682.928527] Code: 49 89 f4 55 48 89 fd 4c 89 ff 53 48 83 ec 10 e8 92 b9 49 00 48 8b 9d a8 02 00 00 48 8d 8d a0 02 00 00 49 89 c2 48 39 cb 74 0f 3b 63 10 74 25 48 8b 5b 08 48 39 cb 75 f1 4c 89 ff 4c 89 d6 e8 [ 682.950237] RSP: 0018:ffffc90006a679f0 EFLAGS: 00010002 [ 682.956285] RAX: 0000000000000286 RBX: ffffffffffffffff RCX: ffff88908343a370 [ 682.964538] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff81690d60 RDI: 0000000000000000 [ 682.972789] RBP: ffff88908343a0d0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 682.981040] R10: 0000000000000286 R11: 3fffffffffffffff R12: ffffffff81690d60 [ 682.989282] R13: ffffffff81690a00 R14: ffff8890819807a8 R15: ffff88908343a36c [ 682.997535] FS: 00007f08c7bfa740(0000) GS:ffff88a03fd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 683.006910] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 683.013557] CR2: 000000000000000f CR3: 0000001080a66003 CR4: 00000000003706e0 [ 683.021819] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 683.030075] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 683.038336] Call Trace: [ 683.041167] devm_kfree+0x33/0x50 [ 683.045004] ice_vsi_free_arrays+0x5e/0xc0 [ice] [ 683.050380] ice_vsi_rebuild+0x4c8/0x750 [ice] [ 683.055543] ice_vsi_recfg_qs+0x9a/0x110 [ice] [ 683.060697] ice_set_channels+0x14f/0x290 [ice] [ 683.065962] ethnl_set_channels+0x333/0x3f0 [ 683.070807] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xea/0x150 [ 683.076152] genl_rcv_msg+0xde/0x1d0 [ 683.080289] ? channels_prepare_data+0x60/0x60 [ 683.085432] ? genl_get_cmd+0xd0/0xd0 [ 683.089667] netlink_rcv_skb+0x50/0xf0 [ 683.094006] genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 [ 683.097638] netlink_unicast+0x239/0x340 [ 683.102177] netlink_sendmsg+0x22e/0x470 [ 683.106717] sock_sendmsg+0x5e/0x60 [ 683.110756] __sys_sendto+0xee/0x150 [ 683.114894] ? handle_mm_fault+0xd0/0x2a0 [ 683.119535] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x1f3/0x690 [ 683.134173] __x64_sys_sendto+0x25/0x30 [ 683.148231] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 683.161992] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Fix this by taking into account the value that num_possible_cpus() yields in addition to vsi->alloc_txq instead of doubling the latter.
Severity: 0.0 | NA
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
Full story here:
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Friendly Disclaimer We do not host or store any files on our website except thread messages, most likely your DMCA content is being hosted on a third-party website and you need to contact them. Representatives of this site ("service") are not responsible for any content created by users and for accounts. The materials presented express only the opinions of their authors.
🚨 Do not get Ripped Off ! ⚖️ Deal with approved sellers or use RTM Escrow on Telegram
Gold
Mitalk.lat official Off Shore Club Chat


Gold

Panel Title #1

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Panel Title #2

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Top